How Science Discredits Itself

Here, in a nutshell, is a short article that explains fully why “They” keep giving us conflicting information on whether a Diet Coke or a barbecued steak or, whatever, is bad for us/not bad for us.

The blame is as much or more with the reporting than the science itself. Especially when the reporter is a journalist, or worse; someone with an axe to grind.

Author: Uisce úr

Though I am old with wandering Through hollow lands and hilly lands, I will find out where she has gone, And kiss her lips and take her hands; And walk among long dappled grass, And pluck till time and times are done, The silver apples of the moon, The golden apples of the sun.

3 thoughts on “How Science Discredits Itself”

  1. It’s very true but until schools start teaching science methodology and statistics and probability and stuff like that I suspect little will change. Meanwhile, I will still avoid soda like the plague.Disguating stuff.

    Liked by 1 person

Please leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s